all of the work that uc, the writing is done by the volunteer community. john: w can you know whois good and who is stupid? >> you know, if nohing is one thing and always try to remind people is that we don't consider it would appeal to be some kin of wide opn former you can come and say and do anything. people will very quickly challenging. we have some of the best and most interesting discussions you can find anywhere. let's actually find what's true, which sources to rely on the most. it's a fascinating process. john: and it's pretty accurate. my site onlly has one mistake. comparing the accurac of scientific articles verses encyclopedia britannica. panicle -- panels of experts and the appropriate specialty founder of course harry instapundit.com errors per injury, three in britannica, not much difference. >> not much difference, and that was several years ago. for me one of the most amusing parts, when the study was being carried out, as soon as it was published some people in the community came to me and said, can you get from the author the list of t